Nominalism – What’s In A Name?

All Saints, Ockham
All Saints, Ockham – Paula Bailey via Flickr

Nominalism is a philosophical position developed in the Middle Ages but with roots going back to Plato and Aristotle.¹

During the Middle Ages, scholastic theologians had intricate and intense debates about nominalism.² So for instructional purposes, nominalism is sometimes simplified into two main forms.

  • Abstract objects do not exist in space and time
  • Universals (e.g. stength, beauty, love) are not real in themselves but merely concepts devised by human beings

The second type of nominalism arose in response to one form of realism in which universal essences are said to be more real than any particular temporal manifestation.

In rejecting realism, William of Occam (circa 1288-1348) maintained that only individuals exist, and universal substances are merely constructions from vocal sounds.

This subject matter might seem esoteric or irrelevant at first glance, but it’s worthwhile mentioning that the claims of some contemporary poststructuralists are similar to Occam’s, even though it is often mistakenly believed that poststructuralism and, more generally, postmodernism are entirely new developments in the history of ideas.

LGBTQ Symbols – Wikipedia

One might argue that poststructuralists differ from the old nominalists by emphasizing the role of social power in the creation, legitimization and reproduction of so-called universal truths—for example, the Catholic Church teaches that God created Man and Woman (Adam and Eve) and LGBTQ communities are pursuing “disordered affections.”³

In actual fact, looking at the links between social power and truth isn’t a particularly new development. For centuries writers, poets and artists have challenged supposedly natural or eternal truths perpetuated by the most powerful, visible, headstrong, and sometimes nasty members of society.

Lucas Cranach the Elder (1472-1553): Adam and ...
Lucas Cranach the Elder (1472-1553): Adam and Eve. Beech wood, 1533. Bode-Museum, Berlin (Erworben 1830, Königliche Schlösser, Gemäldegalerie Kat. 567) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)


² Probably the best secondary source covering these complexities is Frederick Copleston’s A History of Philosophy, Volumes 2-3.

³ This is a recent theme running through Catholic homilies at different parishes. To me it seems like an indirect swipe at everything that challenges Catholic traditionalism. Some of the more conservative priests seem to relish their moment of (imagined) power when they denounce “disordered affections” with a slightly scolding tone. The more, imo, mature and happy priests just skirt the whole issue and focus on more positive pastoral approaches.

On the Web:

Related » Deviance, Idealism, Linguistics, Normal, Occam’s Razor, Skepticism

 Supreme Court to hold oral arguments on same-sex marriage (

 Second Saginaw Diocese priest suspended amid sexual abuse probe (

 A male escort sent a 1,200 page dossier calling 40 priests ‘actively gay’ to the Vatican (

 Cardinal Who Tweeted ‘Nighty-Night, Baby’ Was Just Trying to Message His Sister (



What are you thinking?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.