Rudolf Bultmann

Image via

Rudolf Bultmann (1884-1976) was a German theologian of Lutheran origin who tried to strip away the mythic and ambiguous aspects of the Bible. Bultmann hoped to provide a universal representation of Christ. He believed that trying to pin down the historical details of Christ’s life, including specific teachings by word and example, didn’t really matter.¹ What mattered for Bultmann was that Christ lived, taught and died by crucifixion.²

Perhaps part of the reason Bultmann is not exactly a household name is due to C. G. Jung‘s observation that mankind usually needs myth and symbolic images to fill in the gaps and point to higher realities in ways that dry, intellectual theology cannot.

Hindus, too, recognize the importance of stories and sentimental imagery for many believers. Rather than looking down on this as some kind of childish crutch, those sympathetic to the many ways that religious believers connect with their God see the mythic aspect of religion as indispensable tools. After all, not everyone is attracted to books and intellectual theories. Some people just want to be close to their God. And they’ll naturally do this in a way that suits them best. So, if mythic stories and pretty pictures do it, then so be it.

English: Rudolf_Bultmann Deutsch: Rudolf_Bultmann
English: Rudolf_Bultmann Deutsch: Rudolf_Bultmann (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

On the other hand, Bultmann probably appeals to those who see themselves as intellectuals. And also to those who are appalled at how some fundamentalists cherry pick certain stories from religious texts and uphold them as truth—and, as it usually follows, uphold them as alleged proof that certain beliefs and behaviors are unnatural or evil.

Related Posts » Original Sin

¹ Scholars usually call this Hermeneutics or Exegesis.

Image notes:

  • Ownership of this image is ambiguous; potential copyright owners are asked to contact if you would like it removed.

One comment

  1. Inductive study vs. Deductive study

    Why not let Jesus say, what Jesus said?

    When read through Jung or Bultmann’s glasses (contact lenses) a scewed picture is formed. Why is it that eye-witnesses have unreliable testimonies, yet 2000 years past the event, we “see more clearly” through theologians, psyschologists, or philosophers’ lenses?

    Just some thoughts. . .


What are you thinking?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.