We often hear the term, ‘ideal types,’ but just what does it mean? Well, anyone who’s taken a course in classical sociology should, at least, have some inkling.
Strictly speaking, ideal types are conceptual tools developed by the sociologist Max Weber. They represent an exaggerated category designed to facilitate understanding and dialogue.
Ideal types do not represent statistical averages. Nor do they accurately describe every aspect of a given phenomenon. Rather, they are abstract generalizations.
Weber argues that science cannot avoid developing concepts that are, to some extent, abstract generalizations. This is pretty obvious to anyone who thinks about language and semiotics in general. But Weber isn’t so much offering a philosophical critique of signs. Rather, he’s talking more about getting what he sees as the right balance between the range and focus of a given study. He claims that the type is created through the use of reason, and lies somewhere between meaningless details (i.e. empirical studies devoid of a meaningful, interpretive theory) and overly obscure generalizations (i.e untenable ideas and opinions not carefully thought out with reason).
While ideal types may describe ethical ideals, Weber says that the types themselves do not advocate a particular ethical ideal.
From today’s standpoint, Weber’s reliance on reason to ‘get it right’ and his apparent ability to separate ethics from the pursuit of understanding both have been roundly critiqued from several angles. Nevertheless, an updated version of Weber’s ideal type arguably remains a useful theoretical approach to typology, providing it consciously embraces not only rational but also emotional, aesthetic, intuitive and ethical components.
A good example of Weber’s ideal types is found in his distinction between ‘exemplary’ and ‘instrumental’ religious prophets.
- Max Weber (suraiiah.wordpress.com)
- Marriage, Max Weber, and Verstehen (nortonbooks.typepad.com)
- The shaping of the Western subject: reformation, subject-object alienation, social negation, self-hate + to the collapse of ‘social reality’ (aaronasphar.wordpress.com)
- Barack Obama and Congress: Divided government in the modern era | The Economist (mbcalyn.wordpress.com)
- the entrepreneurial group (orgtheory.wordpress.com)
- Lemmings Marching Off a Cliff… (delong.typepad.com)
- A Cult Leader (siamteva.wordpress.com)
- Politicians Not Connected With Reality…”Empty Wallets” (educationclearinghouse.wordpress.com)
- Abbreviated pundit roundup (dailykos.com)
- Human life and religious meaning: How meanings are created by religion in human life? (dhammaland.wordpress.com)