Think Free



Saint Foucault

Saint Foucault: Sándor Iskender

Poststructuralism could be defined as an ‘approach to knowledge’ that appeared in the social sciences during the 1960s to 1970s as a reaction against or outgrowth of structuralism.

The term was arguably most chic within academic circles during the mid-1980’s to early-1990’s, after which time ‘postmodernism’ seemed to become the more mainstream term, aided perhaps by figures like Jean Baudrillard who made headline-grabbing comments about America’s involvement in the Gulf War.

In its heyday, the term poststructuralism generally contained elements found in postmodernism but referred more to social theory and the history of ideas rather than to art, music and architecture–these applying to postmodernism.

Postmodernism being the broader term, it includes questions posed by poststructuralism.

Although Michel Foucault said he didn’t wish to be pigeonholed as any particular type of theorist, academics in the 1980s often described his later work as poststructuralist.

The distinction between poststructuralism and postmodernism remains unclear, arguably because representative thinkers for each orientation tend to eschew clear-cut, linear modes of reasoning, along with the notion of ‘consistent theory.’ And they all embrace the task of deconstructing the assumptions and related practices associated with traditional approaches to knowledge.

Moreover, the meaning of these terms continues to evolve, especially with the recent turn to spirituality and attempts to integrate this within a poststructural rubric, or lack of one.

With the arrival of the internet, broadband, dramatically increased computing power, and a potentially baffling array of software, digital media and wireless mobile devices, some suggest that poststructuralism and postmodernism are yesterday’s news, these trends giving way to the newer ones of ‘performatism’¹ and ‘digimodernism.’²

However, this seems a bit rash. Have we really stopped deconstructing accepted and acceptable truth claims — i.e. thinking critically — while playing with a mass of hypnotizing gizmos or, perhaps, escaping through superficial, feelgood fantasies?

Let’s hope not.

¹ See, for instance, post-post modernism: “performatism”

² See, and Alan Kirby’s Digimodernism: How New Technologies Dismantle the Postmodern and Reconfigure Our Culture

» Comparative Religion, Counter-Discourse, Discourse, Power, Marx (Karl)

Add to this, report errors, suggest edits or voice your opinion by leaving a comment



Author: is about dialogue, understanding and positive change. Write as many entries as you like. We're not afraid of new ideas!

2 thoughts on “Poststructuralism

  1. I had to look into poststructuralism carefully, since my daughter had a professor at CUNY who is one – Patricia Clough.
    After a lot of reading and reflection, I concluded that these thinkers are a case of mass dissociation attributable in the beginning to the many sources of emotional trauma in mid-20th-century France. So I wrote two long essays about the epistemology of Jacques Derrida and Patricia Clough. They are available on my website — http://www.thesecular


    • Thanks for your thought-provoking comment.

      I’d prefer to say that those with no central sense of self or meaningful spirituality are configured – or permitted to be – that way by God for some reason.

      I don’t think so-called ‘postmodernism’ is all bad. Deconstructing pernicious taken for granted truth claims can be a good thing. The trick, for me anyhow, is to sort through various offerings to discern what I find helpful.


What are you thinking?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s