Blog Archives
Gnosticism
Gnosticism was an early Christian heresy containing many ideas previously existing in different forms and places within the ancient world. These unorthodox beliefs are mentioned in the New Testament by St. Paul, and were more systematically condemned by the Christian Church from the 2nd-century onward.
The Greek word gnosis means “knowledge.” In the context of gnosticism this isn’t bookish but experiential knowledge, supposedly of the divine.
Most gnostics believed that they fully understood the interconnected workings of the heavens, earth and hell and how this related to cosmic redemption. The gnostics’ chief aim was to gain spiritual knowledge and, in effect, become one with the Christ entity.
Some sects claimed that Christ did not die on the cross. Others envisioned him as a cosmic principle that incarnated to raise the world of matter to a higher level of love, awareness and compassion.
Among 49 Gnostic texts and versions of texts that have been unearthed in the early to mid-20th century, each claims to present the final truth about Christ and the nature of the cosmos. But ironically enough, these alleged truths differ considerably among Gnostic sects.
Possibly influenced by Manichaeism, Platonic and even Egyptian lore, Gnostic theories about ultimate reality are often intricate and esoteric. Only apparently ‘special’ people can understand and access elusive Gnostic truths.
By way of contrast, the New Testament is more concerned with universal salvation and less with complicated cosmological theories. Heaven is described in parables. No real attempt is made to ‘say it like it is,’ mainly because God’s creation is portrayed as far too great to be reduced to any human theory.
Hence, the New Testament’s clear and undoubtedly universal invitation: “Knock and the door will be opened (Matthew 7:7, Luke 11:9).
Gnosticism was effectively silenced by the Church Fathers but resurfaced in the Middle ages within Jewish mysticism. And the Gnostic idea of ‘knowing from direct experience’ flourishes today.
Religious studies scholars such as Wayne Meeks say that Gnosticism was particularly threatening to the early Church precisely because it had much in common with orthodox belief. Both say “You are gods” (Psalm 82:6 and John 10:34). And the Gnostic Gospel of Thomas, which some say was written by a twin brother of Jesus, contains sayings of Christ that coincide with those in the New Testament. Other points do differ, however, and virtually no events in the life of Christ are recorded in Thomas.
On the issue of the apparent exclusivity of Gnosticism in contrast to orthodox Christianity, some might say this difference is arguably one of degree. Not a few Christian mystical saints have been regarded as persons more loved by or special to God than, say, the rest of the clergy. Claims like this run throughout, for instance, The Divine Mercy Diary of Saint Kowalska.
More recently, Gnosticism is generally used to denote any kind of spirituality that involves relaxation, meditation or contemplation. The photo featured in this entry, for instance, has the tag line “Practicing zen gnosticism.”
Related Posts » Anthroposophy, Blake (William), Hendrix (Jimi), Irenaeus, Origen, Serpent
Related articles
- Pre-Christian Christ Gnosticism: 2 (vridar.wordpress.com)
- Gnostic Ebionites? (vridar.wordpress.com)
- Agnostic? Gnostic. (thesecretatheist.wordpress.com)
- Gnostic writings omitted for good reason – The Pueblo Chieftain: Life (hartleyd.wordpress.com)
- Paul’s Gnostic heritage & Gnostic opposition (vridar.wordpress.com)
- On Gnosticism, An Introduction (apologus.wordpress.com)
- Gnostic Gnostrils! (bizarrocentral.com)
- Pre-Christian Christ Gnosticism: 3 – the pre-christian date (vridar.wordpress.com)
- Pre-Christian Christ Gnosticism 5 – The Christ Title (2) (vridar.wordpress.com)
The Holy
The German Lutheran scholar Rudolf Otto (1869–1937) describes The Holy in terms of a personal experience.
In The Idea of the Holy (1917) he borrows from the Latin word numen when introducing the term numinous, which refers to ”deeply felt religious experience.”
Experience of the numinous may derive from a monotheistic God or from many pagan gods. When originating from God, Otto says the numinous is endowed with “rationality, purpose, personality and morality.” Pagan numinosity, he suggests, is somehow inferior.
Otto makes a similar distinction between magic and religion. Not trying to be non-judgmental or politically correct, he says magic manifests a “dimmed” numinous, in contrast to the experience of God, which he describes as an awe-filled encounter, a mysterium tremendum and a majestus.
For Otto, the experience of God is the highest type of numinosity. It’s a personal experience of an omnipotent, omniscient power that’s worthy of utmost respect and which inspires not just awe, but also a healthy kind of fear.
The individual is urgently attracted to this power, but the experience of the Godhead may also frighten, humble and purify.
In addition, Otto notes that one would experience a sense of creaturely unworthiness and perhaps wretchedness, standing naked, as it were, in the face of such a great, powerful and “wholly other” Godhead.
Related Posts » Hick (John), James (William), Wach (Joachim)
Related articles
- An Outline of Rudolf Otto’s The Idea of the Holy (epages.wordpress.com)
- Philosophy Word of the Day – Religious Experience (greatcloud.wordpress.com)
- Review – Strange is Normal: The Amazing Life of Colin Wilson (DVD) (epages.wordpress.com)
- The archetypes are gods: Re-godding the archetypes, by John H. Halstead (humanisticpaganism.wordpress.com)
- Parapraxes, Accidents and Necessary Mistakes (epages.wordpress.com)
Hermann Hesse
Hermann Hesse (1877-1962) was a former bookseller and antiquary, born in Württemberg, who became an influential writer and friend of the Swiss psychiartrist Carl Jung.
Hesse’s themes are mostly about his understanding of psychological and spiritual development, outlining how intertwining individual paths play off against and influence one another.
His novels Steppenwolf and Demian deal with Jung’s idea of the shadow. Narcissus and Goldmund contrasts the creative free spirit with the structured cleric. Siddhartha is based on the life of the Buddha. The Glass Bead Game portrays a game in which parallel themes from mathematics, the arts and philosophy creatively connect.
The Chilean diplomat Miguel Serrano says that he, Carl Jung and Hermann Hesse belonged to an “inner circle” of Gnostic-style knowers.¹ If Serrano is implying, as seems to be the case, that only three people would belong to an exclusive “inner circle,” this would indicate a kind of underdeveloped, self-aggrandized mysticism. Surely the ordinary person can be just as, if not more, mystically inclined than these public men of letters.
Hesse, being German, had to deal with the Nazi scourge in one way or another. His initial approach was to detach himself from politics, but it’s clear that he was against the Nazis. His third wife was, in fact, Jewish. And he spoke out against the dark regime long before he married her. Hesse’s publications came to be banned by the Nazis.²
He won the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1946.
—
¹ http://www.amazon.com/C-G-Hermann-Hesse-Miguel-Serrano/dp/3856305580
² http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermann_Hesse#Later_life_and_death
Related Posts » Active Imagination
Related articles
- Review: Siddhartha by Heman Hesse (pwnbhojwani.wordpress.com)
- Masterpiece Monday: Demian (bookclubbabe.wordpress.com)
- Learning from Death and Detachment (my.psychologytoday.com)
- Hermann Hesse – Autobiography (toddlohenry.com)
- Books: The Outsider (time.com)
St. John of the Cross
St. John of the Cross (originally Juan de Yepes y Álvarez 1542-91) was a Spanish mystic born in Ávila.
As a Carmelite monk, he and St. Teresa of Ávila founded the Discalced Carmelites.
In Toledo he was imprisoned in 1577, but he escaped and became Vicar Provincial of Andalusia (1585-87).¹
Today, St. John of the Cross is best known in Catholic and contemplative Christian circles as the author of the Christian spiritual classic, Dark Night of the Soul.
In this introspective account St. John writes from personal experience about the delights and dejection involved in his own path of spiritual purification.
The work is reminiscent of another Christian classic, The Imitation of Christ, by Thomas à Kempis. And it is often cited by Jungians and other contemporary seekers as justification for long periods of feeling lousy, alienated and/or depressed (Carl Jung, himself, used an alchemical metaphor to describe depression as the nigredo—a stage of inner darkness).
While it seems that the spiritual life can involve initial periods of psycho-spiritual darkness and confusion, we should remember that, like St. John indicates, this is usually only a stage. With healthy-minded mysticism, as William James would have put it, some kind of inner “daylight” and meaning should emerge after a period of profound confusion, despair and seeming meaningless.
However, the two states may continue to alternate to some extent through the course of one’s new life. Christian seekers use another metaphor for the negative states, calling them periods of “dryness.” This comes from the idea that the Holy Spirit is experienced as a kind of pure and clean spiritual “water” from above.
St. John was canonized in 1726 and his feast day is on December 14th.
———
¹ This is well described at Wikipedia:
On the night of 2 December 1577, John was taken prisoner by his superiors in the calced Carmelites, who had launched a counter-program against John and Teresa’s reforms. John had refused an order to return to his original house, on the basis that his reform work had been approved by the Spanish Nuncio, a higher authority than John’s direct superiors in the calced Carmelites.[4] John was jailed in Toledo, where he was kept under a brutal regimen that included public lashing before the community at least weekly, and severe isolation in a tiny stifling cell barely large enough for his body. He managed to escape nine months later, on 15 August 1578, through a small window in a room adjoining his cell. (He had managed to pry the cell door off its hinges earlier that day). In the meantime, he had composed a great part of his most famous poem Spiritual Canticle during this imprisonment; his harsh sufferings and spiritual endeavours are then reflected in all of his subsequent writings. The paper was passed to him by one of the friars guarding his cell.
Related articles
- A checklist spirituality that focuses on doing things (opusfree.wordpress.com)
- For All the Beauty There May Be (stevebeckow.com)
- Pope Recommends Spiritual Direction to Every Christian (frstephensmuts.wordpress.com)
- Book Note | Naked Spirituality: A Life with God in 12 Simple Words by Brian D. McLaren (benjaminvineyard.com)
- Basilica Status Sought for Church Where John of Avila Rests (onecatholicorg.wordpress.com)
- Spain: a pilgrimage to the ancient Kingdom of Castile (telegraph.co.uk)
- June 24 in history (homepaddock.wordpress.com)
- The Heart of a Saint: Introduction and Chapter 1 (savedbygodsgrace.wordpress.com)
- Knowing God, Knowing Myself (palamas.info)
Jnana yoga
In Hinduism, jnana yoga [Sanskrit jnana: the path of spiritual knowledge] is the yoga of knowledge. But this isn’t just bookish, conceptual or intellectual knowledge. Instead, the goal of jnana yoga is to know the true self and, for believers in this path, its identity with the Godhead.
Not to say that Jnana yoga never involves erudition, or intellectual and conceptual knowledge. It certainly can. But these are seen as tools to achieve illumination instead of ends in themselves.
The dharma (sacred duty) of jnana yoga is about overcoming ignorance [Sanskrit: avidya] and clearing the path for true spiritual knowledge. And for believers, this kind of knowledge is nothing less than realizing that this changing world (and all the desires that go with it) are illusory. It also means realizing that the personal ego is not the true self.
When the aspirant reaches this stage of awareness, he or she may be confused and even wonder if they’ve gone insane (as did Sri Ramakrishna on occasion). But a healthy transition means that the seeker eventually understands that the atman and brahman are one and the same.
Diagrammatic representation of absolute and manifestation in Jnana Yoga by Swami Vivekananda - Nvineeth via Wikipedia
In the Bhagavad Gita, the Hindu deity Krishna says that jnana yoga is the most difficult of the four central yogas, but also the path dearest to him.
Traditionally associated with the Brahmin caste, the meaning of jnana-yoga would be closer to wisdom instead of erudition. But prominent figures like Sri Aurobindo and Swami Ramacharaka are both quite learned and (allegedly) illuminated.
Related Posts » Bhakti yoga, Hatha yoga, Karma yoga, Raja yoga, Yoga
Related articles
- In Defense of Karma Yoga – Part 1/2 (stevebeckow.com)
- Yoga (olmwsimpletruths.wordpress.com)
- Selfless action and Siddhis (vimokshananda.wordpress.com)
- Anandamayi Ma as the Guru (auromere.wordpress.com)
- Yoga for Computer Users: Supported Side Stretches (reducefat.wordpress.com)
- Thumak Chalat Ram Chandra (sujamusic.wordpress.com)
- Where to Find Free or Cheap Yoga Classes (wisebread.com)
- Practising Titiksha with marshmallows (auromere.wordpress.com)
- In Defense of Karma Yoga – Part 2/2 (stevebeckow.com)
- Karma Action Giveaway (yogiclarebear.com)
Jewish Mysticism
Jewish mysticism, as a means towards getting closer to God, has both orthodox and unorthodox strands.
The Jewish Bible tells of a series of prophets who’ve seen or received messages from God. This is a kind of mysticism, to be sure. But it differs from the more Gonstic influenced forms in that the Biblical prophet doesn’t necessarily earn a visionary experience (or spiritual knowledge) through self-discipline and purification.
When it comes to choosing prophets, the God of the Jewish Bible seems to choose whomever he pleases.
S. G. F. Brandon, suggests that “all the great figures in the history of religion were, basically, mystics.”¹
Martin Buber has been described as a modern representative of a heterodox form of Jewish mysticism called Hasidism. This was
founded in 18th century Eastern Europe by Rabbi Israel Baal Shem Tov as a reaction against overly legalistic Judaism.²
The most popular form of Jewish mysticism, however, is arguably that of Kabbala, especially since being embraced by the pop icon Madonna.
——
¹ A Dictionary of Comparative Religion, S. G. F. Brandon ed., New York: Scribner, 1970, p. 463
² See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasidic_Judaism
Related articles
- 1 reviews of Jewish Mystical Movement and Madonna Fail Malawai (rateitall.com)
- Evan Goldstein: Is Madonna Jewish? (online.wsj.com)
- Unique Judiaca & Jewish Gifts for Valentine’s Day | Jewish HQ (jewishhq.com)
- Tal Rabin on the Divine Jewish Messiah (roshpinaproject.com)
- Madonna’s Malawi scheme collapses (freethinker.co.uk)
- U.S. House approves Jewish chaplains memorial (jta.org)
- Hasidic Judaism. (greatriversofhope.wordpress.com)
- God Fearing Tax Evaders (desertpeace.wordpress.com)
- Choosing my religion (karunamettacat.wordpress.com)
- A Confluence of Holidays (daylightatheism.org)
James, William
William James (1842-1910) was an American pragmatist philosopher/psychologist and the brother of the famous novelist Henry James.
James suffered poor health and frequent bouts of psychological exhaustion but this did not adversely affect his work. His Principles of Psychology (1890) became a popular textbook for psychologists, influencing Carl G. Jung among others.
His collected lectures on religion, published as The Varieties of Religious Experience (1902), remains a classic in religious studies.
James was raised in an affluent and literary Presbyterian family in New York City, later moving to various European cities, Boston and eventually Cambridge Massachusetts. Prominent guests frequented his New England residence, to include statesmen and intellectuals.
This diversity of blue chip characters and opinions likely influenced his outlook. Jung says that he was struck by James’ curiosity and fresh approach to psychology, calling him one of the few open-minded psychological researchers of his era.
James’ theory differentiates the personal and social dimensions of religion. He advocates a religious plurality to accommodate the specific needs of diverse individuals.
In describing direct, unmediated religious experience (i.e. mysticism), James, like Rudolf Otto, says the Godhead possesses a mysterious, non-discursive authority. His ‘Four Marks’ of mysticism have become standard fare in university religion courses.
James says these four marks of mysticism are
- Ineffability: Mysticism must be experienced first-hand, it cannot be adequately described to others through language
- Noetic Quality: The experience is accompanied with an increase in knowledge that cannot be obtained through discursive reasoning
- Transciency: Mystical experiences do not last very long (nuns, monks, yogis and some religious persons would likely disagree on this point)
- Passivity: While bodily exercises or meditation may prepare, facilitate or, perhaps, generate an experience of mysticism, the experience itself is overwhelming, rendering one a passive receptor
James also makes a distinction between “healthy-minded” – i.e. positive – approaches to religion and the morbidly pessimistic “sick soul.”
His comments about the value of saintliness reveal a materialistic bias, especially in his discussion of St. Teresa of Ávila. In keeping with this bias, James’ Principles of Psychology outlines a functionalist approach.
Related Posts » Active Imagination, Alien Possession Theory, Discourse, Functionalism, Hick (John), Holy, Mythic Dissociation, New Age, Religion, Teresa of Ávila, (St.), Wach (Joachim)
Related Articles
- On This Day In Psychology History – April 22 (psychology.about.com)
- Death Followed by Life (psychologytoday.com)
- Stob, “‘Terministic Screens,’ Social Constructionism, and the Language of Experience” (631rhetoric.wordpress.com)
- Those Fabulous James Boys (psychologytoday.com)
- Poppy Field (bethparkerart.wordpress.com)
- Research linking booze and cancer won’t put us off drinking, because alcohol gives us a religious experience (blogs.telegraph.co.uk)
- Bibliography: History of Functionalism (ahp.apps01.yorku.ca)
- Wisdom (Week 2 – Day 1) (celestialpsychology.com)
- Sunday Devotional: Authentic Mystical Experience by Richard Rohr (zoecarnate.wordpress.com)
- Study of Vision Tackles a Philosophy Riddle (thehandiestone.typepad.com)
Kabbala
Kabbala is a group of Jewish teachings about mysticism that arose in 13th century Europe.
Abraham Abulafia (born 1240) says that unlike Old Testament prophets, who passively experience different degrees of God‘s light through grace, the meditating Kabbalist consciously ascends through levels of light to the final realization of God.
Not unlike the Hindu mystics and their beliefs about Sanskrit, Kabbalist mystics believe that the Hebrew letters are both physical and spiritual. The three primordial Kabbalist letters (aleph , mem and shin) are said to contain all of the potential elements of the universe.
Because all Kabbalist letters are ruled by angels, when pronounced properly, a single letter is said to evoke its corresponding angel. And merely writing a Hebrew character apparently can transport the mind to a higher sphere.
While the Zoharic school of Kabbala advocates contemplation of various spheres within a ‘cosmic tree,’ Abulafaria says this is only a prelude to the contemplation of Names, leading to the Divine Name.
Abulafaria openly defies the chain of secrecy that has been maintained for centuries by previous Masters. In the Light of Intellect he claims to have been the first to bring this wisdom to the ordinary person (to include non-Jews), making him popular among Jews and Christians alike.
He also warns his students against the false meditation manuals found in the Middle Ages, which aimed at worldly power through magic.
The most prominent Kabbalist, Israel ben Eleazer, a.k.a. the Baal Shem Tov (Master of the Holy Name), further popularized Jewish-based mysticism, making it universally accessible.
The Baal Shem Tov founded what is now called Hasidic mysticism. Following his example, the Hasidim democratized the Torah, delivering it from privileged scholars to the ordinary person.
As for the dangers of the Kabbalist mystical quest, Perle Epstein is worth quoting at length:
Kabbalists who uttered God’s Names and altered their breathing patterns were making use of the third rung of the soul’s ladder, the breath which tied them to the spiritual world. By binding himself mentally to a specific ‘spiritual being,’ the Kabbalist could either elevate himself further (as Abufalia taught) or he could obtain significant information about the future. This second practice was dangerous, for it often resulted in making contact with shedim, demonic beings who altered and confused the meditator’s mind. Along this path lay the danger of insanity. The ‘breath,’ or third level of soul, was therefore regarded as a two-edged sword. Only utmost purity of purpose assured the Kabbalist safe passage to the next rung. But spontaneous ecstasy would occur here, too-a condition in which the mystic, without any conscious effort, might find himself flooded with a rush of divine bliss. Yet even this level of ‘divine inspiration’ was not really considered true ‘prophecy.’¹
—
¹ Perle Epstein, Kabbalah: the way of the Jewish mystic, Garden City, N.Y. : Doubleday, 1978, p. 143.
Related Posts » Angels, Aurobindo (Sri), Dreams, Individuation Process, Madonna, Tree of Life, Underhill (Evelyn)
Related Articles
- Kabbalist Lindsay Lohan (lukeford.net)
- Introduction to Jewish Mysticism and Kabbalah (epages.wordpress.com)
- Lilith (earthpages.wordpress.com)
- The Eulogizer: Rock music producer, Chabad kabbalist (jta.org)
- William James, part 6: Mystical experience | Mark Vernon (guardian.co.uk)
- Mysticism (earthpages.wordpress.com)
- Mystic (earthpages.wordpress.com)
- Unique Judiaca & Jewish Gifts for Valentine’s Day (play-it-forward.org)
- Jewish holiday symbolizes spiritual growth, enviromental concern (heraldnet.com)
- Kabbalists Have a Dance Party to Madonna’s ‘Like a Prayer’ [VideUhOh] (gawker.com)
Lévi-Bruhl, Lucien
Lucien Lévi-Bruhl (1857-1939) was a pioneering French anthropologist. His studies of so-called primitive cultures had an impact on depth psychology, sociology and philosophy.
Lévi-Bruhl believed that so-called primitive cultures existed in a “pre-logical,” mystical state of mind characterized by non-contradiction and, more importantly, participation in a collective, totemic idea.
He contrasted the pre-logical to the apparently individualized, “rational” peoples possessing contemporary scientific cognition.
Thus Lévi-Bruhl made a fundamental distinction between ‘primitives’ (or ‘natives’) and Western ‘moderns’ or the ‘scientific’ man. He also believed that mankind naturally evolved from the primitive to the scientific and that this was an inevitable process.
In his work How Natives Think (1910), Lévy-Brühl speculated about what he posited as the two basic mindsets of mankind, “primitive” and “Western.” The primitive mind does not differentiate the supernatural from reality, but rather uses “mystical participation” to manipulate the world. According to Lévy-Brühl, moreover, the primitive mind doesn’t address contradictions. The Western mind, by contrast, uses speculation and logic.¹
Late in his career Lévi-Bruhl conceded that modern people also experience mystical dimensions–but not as visibly as so-called primitives. C. G. Jung adopted Lévi-Bruhl’s term participation mystique to assert that the collective unconscious is a buried storehouse of psychological energy inherited from mankind’s ancestral past.
—
¹ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucien_L%C3%A9vy-Bruhl
Related Posts » Vampires, teleology
Related Articles
- Modernism (earthpages.wordpress.com)
- Claude Lévi-Strauss: The Poet in the Laboratory, By Patrick Wilcken (independent.co.uk)
- The Structuralist (3quarksdaily.com)
- Myth (earthpages.wordpress.com)
- Ufos and Jungian Archetypes (socyberty.com)
- “This thing of dorkness” (jennydavidson.blogspot.com)
- The Innovation Totem (paul.kedrosky.com)
- Morphogenetic Fields (earthpages.wordpress.com)
- Podcast Review of Jung and Eckhart by Dave Tacey (psipsychologytutor.org)
- Claude Lévi-Strauss: the Poet in the Laboratory (newstatesman.com)
Mysticism
The term mysticism has a wide variety of meanings.
In ancient Greece an initiate (mystes) was lead into a mystery, a highly esoteric process where initiates swore to secrecy.
Today mysticism generally refers to surpassing worldly sensations, thoughts and desires, which are temporarily replaced or infused with otherworldly experiences, knowledge or graces.
However, this kind of definition falls short because we also have romantic or nature mysticism.
Perhaps at its highest level mysticism refers to an intimate spiritual relationship – others say union – with God or the divine.
Although not appearing in the Bible or in the writings of the Church Fathers, the related terms “mystical,” “mystagogy” and “mystagogue” explain one’s initiation into the essentially mysterious sacraments of the Christian Church.
It’s often said that Christian mysticism differs from Eastern mysticism in that Christianity emphasizes a relationship between the individual and God, rather than a loss of individuality and absorption into, or total identification with, the divine.
But this difference, in practice, is likely one of degree, character, or perhaps a developmental difference.
There seem to be exceptions, at least on the conceptual level, to a general distinction between the ideas of Christian relationship and Eastern absorption. For example, some Christian saints request in their prayers to be entirely immersed in Jesus’ divine glory. This idea of immersion sounds very Eastern.
And the Hindu school of Visistadvaita (founded by Ramanuja) maintains that a sense of individuality rests within the ultimate and eternal, and idea which sounds very Christian.
To further complicate matters, , even within a given tradition mystics talk of a diversity of realms and numinous experiences. So it seems unlikely that the experiences accessed by mystics within different traditions are identical.
Some writers and pop gurus try to condense different kinds of mysticism into a simple formula, such as “union with the divine.”
In fact, most spiritual seekers usually try to fit very different ideas about mysticism into their own particular belief system.
Filipmoroz adds:
In my opinion mystics, who always need the adjective of religion they came from while described, did achieved such level of union with divine that does not need religion anymore. Religion needs words meanwhile their level of union does not. » Source
Related Posts » Campbell (Joseph), Deism, Dioinysius the Areopagite, Fasting, Gnosticism, Hesse (Hermann), James, (William), Jainism, Jewish Mysticism, Kabbala, Karma Transfer, Kowalska (St. Maria Faustina Helena), Mishlove, (Jeffrey), Mystic, Pantheism, Sufism, Underhill (Evelyn), Wisdom
Related Articles
- Mysticism (brighthub.com)
- Spotlight On Melissa Manfull’s Mystic Geometry On View At Taylor De Cordoba, Los Angeles (huffingtonpost.com)
- Fringe Festival review: The Mad 7 – A Mystical Comedy with Ecstatic Dance (timeoutny.com)
- Thoughts on Christian Mysticism (simuleustisetpecator.wordpress.com)
- Intro to the Mystic from Greyhawk Grognard (greyhawkgrognard.blogspot.com)
- Rabbi Alan Lurie: The Mystical Experience: A Question of What’s Beyond (huffingtonpost.com)
- Perspectives on Pentecost (gkupsidedown.blogspot.com)
- End of The World 2012 (socyberty.com)
- Mantra (earthpages.wordpress.com)

























