Blog Archives
Balder
An illustration of the blind Höðr killing Baldr, from an Icelandic 18th century manuscript. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Also known as Baldur or Baldr in Norse mythology, Balder was a noble, gentle and yet powerful god. Much loved by all, he was son of Odin and Frigg.
Reminiscent of Achilles, Balder was invulnerable to harm, except by the mistletoe. He was mistakenly killed by the blind god Hodur, who’d been duped by the trickster Loki into piercing him with a dart crafted from mistletoe.
The ensuing weeping among the Aesir immortals over the death of Balder lead some to liken him to the Norse version of Christ.
The roots of the his name are somewhat unclear. Wikipedia has a good discussion here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baldr#Name.
Related articles
- Norway returned to worship pagan gods like Odin and Balder (ivarfjeld.com)
- When did gods become immortal, infallable and immaterial? (richarddawkins.net)
- Odin The All Father (theasatrucommunity.wordpress.com)
- Ásatrú (ayearandadaywicca.wordpress.com)
- Odin Part 1 (theasatrucommunity.wordpress.com)
- ‘Loki’s Wolves’ is coming in May (eyeblinkfiction.wordpress.com)
Consubstantiation
English: The Lord’s Supper. Christ standing at an Orthodox altar, giving the Eucharist to the Twelve Apostles. Frescoes in the upper church of Spaso-Preobrazhenski cathedral. Valaam Monastery Русский: Алтарная апсида верхнего храма Спасо-Преображенского собора Валаамского монастыря. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Consubstantiation is the teaching about the Lord’s Supper that says Christ is “in, with, and under” the bread and wine, which themselves are not altered in substance.¹ It’s often associated with Martin Luther, even though he spoke in terms of “sacramental union.”
The teaching, however, resonates with Luther’s view that Christ’s divine and human aspects are so closely united that he is omnipresent within all of creation.
Wikipedia outlines the, perhaps, first visibly historical incidence of consubstantiation:
In England in the late 14th century, there was a political and religious movement known as Lollardy. Among much broader goals, the Lollards affirmed a form of consubstantiation—that the Eucharist remained physically bread and wine, while becoming spiritually the body and blood of Christ. Lollardy survived up until the time of the English Reformation.²
—
¹ An alteration of substance but not of form is key to the Catholic belief in transubstantiation.
² http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consubstantiation#History_and_culture
Related Posts » Eucharist
Related articles
- On Eucharist (intostillness.wordpress.com)
- The ‘Jesus’ the World Loves (pilgrimpassing.com)
- “I think I understand how the typical Protestant feels… (insightscoop.typepad.com)
- Confession of faith for Jewish converts to Christianity, from the Church of Constantinople (dailyminyan.com)
- Can a non-Catholic receive Communion at a Catholic church? (swordsoftruth.com)
Christology
Christology is the theological study of Jesus Christ as a human and Divine being.
Various Christian sects in early Christianity emphasized either Christ’s humanity at the expense of his Divinity or, conversely, his Divinity at the expense of his humanity.
The Christian Church took great pains to officially resolve these as heresies.
Related Posts » Apollinarius, Arius, Gnosticism, Monophysitism, Nestorius.
Related articles
- Review of Paul’s Divine Christology (Chris Tilling) (diglotting.com)
- Christology Book available from Amazon (theodorezachariadesblog.wordpress.com)
- Jesus was a … shaman (heterodox Christologies II) (heterodoxology.com)
- Christianity (earthpages.wordpress.com)
- LGBT Bloggers Write on “The Queer God”. (queeringthechurch.com)
- The Greek Theological Paradigm (lifeandbuilding.com)
- The wondrous Nicholas… (thehandmaid.wordpress.com)
- Herman Bavinck on the Incarnation {Advent’12 [1]} (prodigalpaul.com)
- the Catholic Church (faithandspirit.wordpress.com)
- Paul and Union With Christ, by Con Campbell (zwingliusredivivus.wordpress.com)
Christianity
Christianity is the religion based on the life, teachings, moral example, crucifixion and resurrection of the New Testament figure, Jesus Christ. Jesus was the son of a young Jewish woman, Mary, who conceived while engaged to her carpenter fiance, Joseph. The Jesus story tells us that Mary didn’t have sexual relations with Joseph but, instead, was visited by the angel Gabriel who told her that she’d become pregnant by the power of the Holy Spirit—a calling which Mary willingly accepted. So technically, Joseph was Jesus’ foster father.
Founded in Jerusalem, the Christian religion emerged from the Jewish scriptural tradition, which Christians today call the Old Testament. Jesus, in fact, is seen by his followers as the long awaited prophet promised in Jewish scriptures.
As with contemporary Christianity, Early Christianity was shaped by the Jesus story. But this isn’t all. There’s also the living grace which believers claim to experience. So rather than their religion being a dry routine based on some distant past event, believers say they can feel the Holy Spirit acting in their lives, here and now.¹
These two elements – the teachings and example of the earthly Christ along with the perceived guidance and indwelling love of the heavenly Christ – forged an unshakable belief in many of Christ’s early followers.
Some early Christians believed that Christ’s promised return – signalling the end of the world – was imminent. In one letter St. Paul chastises believers for not working due to their misguided belief about the end-times occurring within their lifetimes (2 Thessalonians 3:10, Matthew 24:36, Mark 13:32).
The religion spread throughout the Mediterranean’s Gentile (non-Jewish) population for about 20 years after Christ’s death. It was declared an “illegal assembly” under Roman Law. And the tyrant Nero publicly blamed Christians for the great fire in Rome of 64 CE.
Cruel and barbaric persecutions at the hands of the pagan Romans followed but the religion continued to spread. While some Christians denied their belief in Christ when threatened with horrendous torture and death, a good number willingly – some even joyously – went to their deaths at the hands of the pagan Romans.
The graceful and heroic courage of Christians being fed alive to lions in the Colosseum at Rome impressed some of the more sensitive Romans, leading to their conversion to this new monotheistic religion. Conversions didn’t just take place among the poor, as commonly believed. By 96 CE the radical egalitarianism of Christianity became increasingly apparent as members of the Roman Imperial family also converted away from their pagan past. By the end of the 2nd-century, Christianity had spread into Britain.
Why was Christianity so successful?
Some sociologists suggest that the Christian message gave hope of eternal reward to the powerless and oppressed. In other words, it’s a religion for losers. But historians more correctly note that the religion cut across all class lines, fostered warm communal love and complete forgiveness for past wrongs, along with the promise of power over demons and everlasting life in heaven. Theologians add that the spiritual power of the living Christ has always been present among believers in the form of the Holy Spirit, giving life, love and direction to their religious worship.
In 313 CE Constantine issued an edict of toleration in Milan, enabling Christians to worship without fear of persecution. In 381 CE Theodosius made Christianity the official religion of the Roman empire.
Some Christian sects in early Christianity emphasized either Christ’s humanity at the expense of his Divinity, or conversely, his Divinity at the expense of his humanity. The Church took great pains to officially resolve these as “heresies.”
Christianity continued to expand through the Roman empire. When the Western empire fell in 476 CE, the barbarian invaders were converted.
During the so-called Dark Ages, the Papal court fell into disrepute. Several Popes become blatantly corrupt. Murder, intrigue and absurd rationalizations for grave evils abounded. The flame of Christianity, however, was kept alive in the European monasteries. Monks by and large were disgusted with the scandalous and violent practices of the Papal court.
In the East, Christianity continued as ‘Byzantium’ until overrun my Muslim invaders in 1453 CE.
The Orthodox Church had become split by the 11th-century. Apart from subtle theological differences, the Western Church recognized the Pope while the Eastern Church did not.
Several additional heresies were squelched by the Western Church but the 16th-century rise of the Reformers and the Counter-Reformation created a decisive split between Protestants and Roman Catholics.
Protestant Churches, themselves, began to splinter, with many new denominations rising up, usually at the bidding of some charismatic reformer claiming to rekindle the “original truth” of Christianity.
Despite doctrinal differences among various branches of Christianity in the 21st-century, almost all Christians believe in the doctrine of the Trinity. This is the belief that God reveals himself in three ‘persons’ of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. These three distinct persons are said to be equal, eternal and also a unity, sharing the same substance.
Today Christianity is a world-wide religion of over 2.2 billion followers, largely the result of colonization and missionary work among various Christian denominations.
—
¹ Problems arise when different believers claim opposing ‘truths’ based on the apparent experience of the Holy Spirit. Quite possibly some individuals mistake a kind of vital, perhaps even biochemical, energy for the true love and peace of the Holy Spirit.
Related Posts » Christology, Church, Church Fathers
Related articles
- History of purgatory (divinelightblog.wordpress.com)
- Can’t we just work together? (tolivelifetothefull.wordpress.com)
- A Long Oral Tradition: Step four in the development of early Christian faith (mikerivageseul.wordpress.com)
- Changing the Face of Christianity Reports on the State of Christianity Today (prweb.com)
- rants: a pagan or atheist at heart? (christiannoob.wordpress.com)
- Our Righteousness in Christ (missiontopapua.wordpress.com)
- This is Good News – A Devotion (lthomason.wordpress.com)
- What Happened to the Old-Fashion Religion? (5ptsalt.com)
- Christianity Is Not a Religion!!!! (encounterss.wordpress.com)
- The Uniqueness of Christianity: 12 Objections Answered (insightscoop.typepad.com)
Catholicism
Catholicism denotes the entire body of Catholic faithful along with their creeds, churches, institutions, clergy and hierarchy.
Contemporary Catholics believe that the Catholic faith follows the authentic teachings of Christ as given to the apostles and recorded in scripture, these teachings being preserved, present and developed through a legitimate and holy apostolic tradition.
Catholics comprise the single largest body of religious believers on the planet, and about half of all Christians.
The Latin and Eastern Catholic Churches together form the “Catholic Church”,[21] or “Roman Catholic Church”,[22] the world’s largest single religious body and the largest Christian church, comprising over half of all Christians (1.1 billion Christians of 2.1 billion) and nearly one-sixth of the world’s population.¹
—
¹ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholicism
Related Posts » Dogma, Infallibility
Related articles
- Catholic (earthpages.wordpress.com)
- Islamists Kill Scores at Nigerian Roman Catholic Church (nationalreview.com)
- Joe Biden’s Religion: Catholicism or Leftism? (trinityspeaks.wordpress.com)
- 5 YouTube Videos that Turn Heads TOWARDS Catholicism (ignitumtoday.com)
- Catholicism: A Catholic View of Halloween (gingerjar2.wordpress.com)
- Catholicism fast becoming the dominant US religion new poll shows — As Protestant numbers decline, Catholics now come center stage (irishcentral.com)
- Life on a prayer for Jimmy Savile (thecommentator.com)
- How the vice-presidential debate emphasized ‘single-issue’ Catholicism – Articles (religionnews.com)
- 50 years after Vatican II began (coffeeringstheology.wordpress.com)
- Catholicism and Sex Shops: The Struggle for Poland’s Soul (frstephensmuts.wordpress.com)
Dyophysitism
A diagram showing the Nestorian view of Christ: Containing both a human and divine person. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Dyophysitism is the religious doctrine, defined in 451 at the Council of Chalcedon, declaring that Christ possesses a dual nature, one entirely Divine and the other entirely human.
The term has also been applied to Nestorian beliefs, although theologians continue to debate whether or not this is justified.
Related Posts » Monophysitism
Related articles
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyophysite
- Sempiternus Rex (en.wikipedia.org)
- Jesus Christ: Truly Human, Truly God (factorysense.wordpress.com)
- When Truths Collide-Part 5 (steveatwood.wordpress.com)
- “Tasting Heaven on Earth” (gaudetetheology.wordpress.com)
- Debating doctrine with charity – is that possible? (signposts02.wordpress.com)
- Crysologus (bythepen.me)
- The Inane Notion of Religious Pluralism (inchristus.wordpress.com)
Gospel of Matthew
The Gospel of Matthew is one of the synoptic gospels of the New Testament (NT).
Although it appears first in the NT, it was written after Mark. Scholars date it from 60-100 CE. This would make it improbable but not impossible that Matthew, himself, wrote it.
Matthew is generally believed to be based on at least two sources: The Gospel of Mark and a hypothesized but entirely undiscovered document simply called “Q” (from the German quelle, meaning “source”).
Papias, said to be Bishop of Hieropolis (60-130 CE), apparently wrote that Matthew kept an account of the life and sayings of Christ. But Papias’ document has been lost. The early historian Eusebius (260-340 CE), however, mentions Papias’ book, The Sayings of the Lord Explained, which claims that Matthew wrote about Christ in Aramaic.
The Wikipedia entry sums up our current state of knowledge this way:
“Matthew” probably originated in a Jewish-Christian community in Roman Syria towards the end of the 1st century.[1] The anonymous author probably drew on a number of sources, including the Gospel of Mark, the sayings collection known as the Q source, and material unique to his own community, as well as his own experience.¹
Regardless of who wrote it and how, Matthew tells us about the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
—
¹ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Matthew
Related articles
- What Matthew wrote and what did not? – Gary Cottrell’s overview (nomorefear.wordpress.com)
- Who Wrote the Oldest Gospel? Hint: The One Apostle Who Owned Ink and Parchment (cantuar.blogspot.com)
- Introduction To Gospel of Matthew: By Dr.WR ‘Dick’ Lockhart (chaplaingary.wordpress.com)
- Why Christ rose from the dead in four different ways (vridar.wordpress.com)
- Matthew 1:1-1 Posted By DR. WR “Dick” Lockhart (chaplaingary.wordpress.com)
Gospel of Luke
The Gospel of Luke is one of the synoptic gospels and the third book of the New Testament.
The only gospel with a prologue, Luke tells his readers that the work is based on research rather than direct observation.
Contemporary scholars believe that Luke drew on the Gospel of Mark and another, as of yet undiscovered, document that scholars have called Q. Scholars also believe that Luke could have drawn on other written sources.
Particular to Luke is the Nativity scene (Luke 1:26-80), the account of Jesus’ childhood (Luke 2:41-52), and the human genealogy of Christ (3:23-38).
Luke’s gospel tends to emphasize marginalized people, women and the importance of prayer. Depending on who you’re talking to, scholars believe it was written sometime between 60 CE and 100 CE.
Related Posts » Luke (St.), Acts of the Apostles
Related articles
- Why Did Jesus Come To Earth? – Lee Strobel and When Was the Gospel of Luke Written? (rodiagnusdei.wordpress.com)
- Studies of the Gospel of Luke the Gentile.1 (rev12eleven.wordpress.com)
- The earliest gospels 6(c) – Luke’s Gospel (Couchoud) (vridar.wordpress.com)
- The autorship of the Gospels _ Gary Cottrell (nomorefear.wordpress.com)
- Mark and the Other Synoptics (coffeehouseapologetics.wordpress.com)
Gospel of John
The Gospel of John is the fourth Gospel of the New Testament, probably written around 90 CE. John is normally separated from the first three synoptic gospels due to its portrayal of Christ as the Son of God, the divine Word, and also because of its coverage of Christ’s teachings and life.
While most bible scholars see its authorship as anonymous (or as composed by a Johannine community), it’s often believed to have been written by John the son of Zebedee, the “beloved disciple” of Jesus (John 21:24).
Probably because of its ambiguous origins, each generation of bible scholars seems have a new idea as to just who wrote it.
Scholars also believe that existing religious tensions (between Jews who didn’t accept Christ as the Messiah vs. all those who did) most likely contributed to its formation.
This post needs more content. Why not help us out and expand it? Please remember that copying and pasting large amounts of material from Wikipedia (or some other online encyclopedia) is not what Earthpages.ca is about. We want a fresh view, from you… not from your copy and paste editor!
Thanks,
Michael Clark, Ph.D.
Related articles
- After Much Thought…I’ve Chosen the Gospel of John (thebiblerunner.wordpress.com)
- Did John Write the Fourth Gospel? (thesacredpage.com)
- John on grace and truth (cinhosa.wordpress.com)
- “The Gospel of John” by Margaret Feinberg { Preparing for Lent } (nicoleandkevin.wordpress.com)
- My Favorite Gospel (teresasthoughtsfortoday.wordpress.com)
- The earliest gospels 5 – Gospel of John (according to P L Couchoud) (vridar.wordpress.com)
- The Gospel of John (thechristianpundit.org)
- Dec 27th: John, the (Queer) Evangelist. (queeringthechurch.com)
- John 10 – I Am The Good Shepherd (readingacts.wordpress.com)
Gnosticism
Gnosticism was an early Christian heresy containing many ideas previously existing in different forms and places within the ancient world. These unorthodox beliefs are mentioned in the New Testament by St. Paul, and were more systematically condemned by the Christian Church from the 2nd-century onward.
The Greek word gnosis means “knowledge.” In the context of gnosticism this isn’t bookish but experiential knowledge, supposedly of the divine.
Most gnostics believed that they fully understood the interconnected workings of the heavens, earth and hell and how this related to cosmic redemption. The gnostics’ chief aim was to gain spiritual knowledge and, in effect, become one with the Christ entity.
Some sects claimed that Christ did not die on the cross. Others envisioned him as a cosmic principle that incarnated to raise the world of matter to a higher level of love, awareness and compassion.
Among 49 Gnostic texts and versions of texts that have been unearthed in the early to mid-20th century, each claims to present the final truth about Christ and the nature of the cosmos. But ironically enough, these alleged truths differ considerably among Gnostic sects.
Possibly influenced by Manichaeism, Platonic and even Egyptian lore, Gnostic theories about ultimate reality are often intricate and esoteric. Only apparently ‘special’ people can understand and access elusive Gnostic truths.
By way of contrast, the New Testament is more concerned with universal salvation and less with complicated cosmological theories. Heaven is described in parables. No real attempt is made to ‘say it like it is,’ mainly because God’s creation is portrayed as far too great to be reduced to any human theory.
Hence, the New Testament’s clear and undoubtedly universal invitation: “Knock and the door will be opened (Matthew 7:7, Luke 11:9).
Gnosticism was effectively silenced by the Church Fathers but resurfaced in the Middle ages within Jewish mysticism. And the Gnostic idea of ‘knowing from direct experience’ flourishes today.
Religious studies scholars such as Wayne Meeks say that Gnosticism was particularly threatening to the early Church precisely because it had much in common with orthodox belief. Both say “You are gods” (Psalm 82:6 and John 10:34). And the Gnostic Gospel of Thomas, which some say was written by a twin brother of Jesus, contains sayings of Christ that coincide with those in the New Testament. Other points do differ, however, and virtually no events in the life of Christ are recorded in Thomas.
On the issue of the apparent exclusivity of Gnosticism in contrast to orthodox Christianity, some might say this difference is arguably one of degree. Not a few Christian mystical saints have been regarded as persons more loved by or special to God than, say, the rest of the clergy. Claims like this run throughout, for instance, The Divine Mercy Diary of Saint Kowalska.
More recently, Gnosticism is generally used to denote any kind of spirituality that involves relaxation, meditation or contemplation. The photo featured in this entry, for instance, has the tag line “Practicing zen gnosticism.”
Related Posts » Anthroposophy, Blake (William), Hendrix (Jimi), Irenaeus, Origen, Serpent
Related articles
- Pre-Christian Christ Gnosticism: 2 (vridar.wordpress.com)
- Gnostic Ebionites? (vridar.wordpress.com)
- Agnostic? Gnostic. (thesecretatheist.wordpress.com)
- Gnostic writings omitted for good reason – The Pueblo Chieftain: Life (hartleyd.wordpress.com)
- Paul’s Gnostic heritage & Gnostic opposition (vridar.wordpress.com)
- On Gnosticism, An Introduction (apologus.wordpress.com)
- Gnostic Gnostrils! (bizarrocentral.com)
- Pre-Christian Christ Gnosticism: 3 – the pre-christian date (vridar.wordpress.com)
- Pre-Christian Christ Gnosticism 5 – The Christ Title (2) (vridar.wordpress.com)















![Eigerøy lighthouse III [Explored #4] Eigerøy lighthouse III [Explored #4]](http://static.flickr.com/2879/8805431526_732f27a085_m.jpg)

![iris [EXPLORE] iris [EXPLORE]](http://static.flickr.com/5447/8804295392_5e80293463_m.jpg)








